Ripple is in trouble – A lawsuit to Ripple: Did Ripple Violate State and Federal Laws?

The crypto token company allegedly sold its XRP coins to the public recently in what was “termed as a never-ending and continuous initial coin offering,” according to the lawsuit. As reported by Bloomberg, an investor went on to file the lawsuit against the financial tech startup (arguably the third most valuable cryptocurrency in the market by market cap) alleging that the digital currency firm violated both state and federal laws after it allegedly offered unregistered securities to investors in a recent fundraiser.

Ripple is in Trouble

The legal complaint asserts as reported by Bloomberg that XRP created billions of digital coins “from nowhere or out of thin air as the complainant put it” and sold these coins to the public in a never-ending ICO offering.” As per the issue of cryptocurrencies been regarded as securities the debate is still on hence whether this suit will be fruitful or not remains to be seen.

SEE ALSO:   Cryptocurrency Price Analysis: Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin (BTC), Ripple (XRP), Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Others Are Heading North (Cryptocurrency News Today)

The lawsuit filed by an investor named Ryan Coffey in the San Francisco County Superior Court this Thursday seeks class-action status. He is seeking damages “on behalf of every other investor who purchased Ripple’s tokens issued on the said date and sold by the Defendant.” The complaint purchased 650 Ripple tokens for 2.60 USD each and sold them several weeks later for about 1.70 USD each, according to the lawsuit. Ripple have shared their view on the issue in a statement:

“We have seen the tweet about a lawsuit filed against us recently, but we haven’t been served. Like is the case in civil proceedings, we will assess the situation around the allegations when it is appropriate. Whether Ripple is a security or not is up to the SEC to decide. We will continue to say that XRP shouldn’t be called security.”

SEE ALSO:   Is Ripple a Security? Ripple Is Not a Security, Brad Garlinghouse Argues

James Taylor-Copeland, the U.S attorney who is representing Coffey, did not respond immediately when a request for comment was made. Coffey, the investor, seeks unspecified damages plus a declaration that the digital currency firm sold unregistered securities.

 

loading...

Legal Disclaimer: The content of this website (smartereum.com) is intended to convey general information only. This website does not provide legal, investment, tax, etc advice. You should not treat any information on smartereum.com as a call to make any particular decision regarding cryptocurrency usage, legal matters, investments, taxes, cryptocurrency mining, exchange usage, wallet usage, initial coin offerings (ICO), etc. We strongly suggest seeking advice from your own financial, investment, tax, or legal adviser. Neither smartereum.com nor its parent companies accept responsibility for any loss, damage, or inconvenience caused as a result of reliance on information published on, or linked to, from smartereum.com.

SEE ALSO:   Ethereum vs Bitcoin: Does Ethereum have the potential to overtake Bitcoin? (Bitcoin Ethereum Predictions 2018) - Ethereum Bitcoin Comparison -Sun Jun 24

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Get Smart About Crypto!


Promise we won’t spam you!

We Are Hiring

Click here if you would like to join one of the fastest growing blockchain news companies in the world!