Alibaba vs Alibabacoin Foundation: US Court Rejects Alibaba Motion to Block ‘Alibabacoin’ Cryptocurrency

Alibaba vs Alibabacoin Foundation: US Court Rejects Alibaba Motion to Block ‘Alibabacoin’ Cryptocurrency

A US district court has rejected a petition from e-commerce giants Alibaba Group Holdings Ltd against to stop cryptocurrency company, Alibabacoin Foundation from using the “Alibaba” name for its cryptocurrency.

In the case brought before him at the Southern District of New York, Judge Paul Oetken ruled that Alibaba did not show any jurisdiction in the United States that the use of the Alibabacoin name would hurt its business prospects and therefore struck out the request for a preliminary injunction against the cryptocurrency firm.

In a case filed on April 2, Alibaba had alleged Alibabacoin hurt its business in the United States, causing actual confusion among customers there. Oetken did not agree with this saying that Alibaba did not show reasonable probability that Alibabacoin’s websites were used to do business in New York.

SEE ALSO:   Ethereum Predictions 2018: How High Can The Price Of Ethereum Go? ETH News Today -Fri Jun 22

The judge said that any possible damage to Alibaba’s business, goodwill, and reputation from the alleged trademark infringement likely occurred in China where it is based. Defending Lawyers argued that China’s ban on initial coin offerings (ICOs) makes it impossible for consumers in China to confuse Alibabacoin as associated with Alibaba Group.

Oetken further said that it did not matter that Alibabacoin might eventually list its cryptocurrency on U.S. exchanges or if its website is hosted by a New York company.

Response from Alibabacoin (ABBC) Foundation

Soon after the ruling, Alibabacoin released a tweet acknowledging the court’s decision. The tweet read: “We firmly believe that Alibabacoin Foundation never acted illegally. Fair and square speaking, we strongly believe and trust the judge’s decision above all else.”

SEE ALSO:   IOTA Tangle Update: The Tangle System of IOTA (MIOTA) Will Now Be Used For Digital IDs

The Dubai-based cryptocurrency firm stood by their earlier position that they did not intend to Alibaba’s reputation to promote its coin saying that the ‘Alibaba’ name was magical and cannot be monopolized by Alibaba Group.

loading...

Legal Disclaimer: The content of this website (smartereum.com) is intended to convey general information only. This website does not provide legal, investment, tax, etc advice. You should not treat any information on smartereum.com as a call to make any particular decision regarding cryptocurrency usage, legal matters, investments, taxes, cryptocurrency mining, exchange usage, wallet usage, initial coin offerings (ICO), etc. We strongly suggest seeking advice from your own financial, investment, tax, or legal adviser. Neither smartereum.com nor its parent companies accept responsibility for any loss, damage, or inconvenience caused as a result of reliance on information published on, or linked to, from smartereum.com.

SEE ALSO:   Co-CEO of Robinhood, Vlad Tenev: "Ruling Out Bitcoin (BTC) Because of Recent Price Changes is an Unwise Decision" (Bitcoin News Today)

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Get Smart About Crypto!


Promise we won’t spam you!

We Are Hiring

Click here if you would like to join one of the fastest growing blockchain news companies in the world!